Tuesday, December 17, 2013

Companies Act Allows Contributions to Political Parties

Press Information Bureau
Government of India
Ministry of Corporate Affairs
17-December-2013 19:55 IST

Contributions to Political Parties by Companies
Section 182 of the Companies Act permits companies to contribute amounts, directly or indirectly to a political party subject to limitations and disclosure requirements laid down therein. Giving this information in written reply to a question in the Rajya Sabha, Shri Sachin Pilot, Minister for Corporate Affairs, said that it has recently been clarified that companies making contributions to a political party or parties through ‘Electoral Trust Companies’ constituted in pursuance of the scheme notified by the Ministry of Finance will be required to only reflect the amount contributed by them to an Electoral Trust company in its books of accounts. The Electoral Trust Companies are, however, required to indicate the amounts passed on to them to a political party or parties in the manner laid down in Section 182(3).

-----------------------------


KKP

Wednesday, December 11, 2013

MDGs can help guide the way for strategic CSR


NEW DELHI: The Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) are eight international development goals that were signed by 189 countries in 2000 with India being one of the signatories. One of the most basic aims of the MDGs was halving world poverty by 2015 besides improving other indices such as education, environment, health and so on.

Schedule VII of the new CSR policy under the Companies Act 2013 that prescribes the activities on which a Company can spend their CSR funds is almost perfectly in sync with the MDGs.

With two years still remaining before the MDGs to expire, it is imperative that all stakeholders come together to give a last push to attain these goals.

Since studies released on the state of CSR in India have pointed towards duplication of effort being a major problem in the CSR scenario, a much more strategic and methodological approach to make informed decisions is needed.

This especially becomes pertinent, as corporates will need to put information relating to their CSR activities on their websites, throwing it open to stakeholder and public scrutiny at large.

An understanding of the MDGs can help guide the wayfor identifying where CSR funding and expertise is most needed andwhat are the areas where it will have maximumimpact.

In this context, the Centre for Ethical Life & Leadership (CELL Advisory-a not-for-profit organization) led by Dr.S Y Quraishi, former Chief Election Commissioner (CEC)of India will be organizing a half-day Conclave titled ‘UN-Corporate MDG Conclave’ in association with the UNDP and the Indian Institute of Corporate Affairs (IICA) on 19th December, 2013 at The Claridges, New Delhi.

MoS of Human Resource Development, Dr. ShashiTharoorwill deliver the Valedictory Address and Dr. BhaskarChatterjee, DG & CEO of IICA will deliver the Keynote Address.

MrHarpal Singh, Mentor & Chairman Emeritus, Fortis Healthcare will inaugurate the Conclave and address the august gathering.

The agenda has been grouped into three sessions: Poverty (Hunger), Health (Public Health) and Environment & Sustainability. Each session will be led by eminent persons/experts on the subject representing Government/ Policy makers, Implementing agencies like NGOs/CSOs and the Corporatesector.

The core idea is to take a strategic approach towards CSR by reviewing where we stand on various development indices and find the gaps most in need of intervention.

“Corporate India should come forward and actively participate in the development of the country’s social issues which will not only fulfill their CSR agenda but also contribute in bridging the gap in the MDG before they expire in 2015″ opined Dr S Y Quraishi,CEC and Honorary Chairman, CELL.

 

Tuesday, December 10, 2013

Companies need to improve disclosures on CSR expenditure:

Under the new companies law, certain class of entities have to spend at least two per cent of their three-year average net profit towards Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) activities.

 
NEW DELHI: Many Indian companies might be shelling out money on social welfare activities but the quality of disclosures, particularly on the amount spent for such work, needs to be improved, says a report.

Under the new companies law, certain class of entities have to spend at least two per cent of their three-year average net profit towards Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) activities.

"For most companies, current CSR disclosure levels are poor. There is a need for significant improvement in the quality of disclosure on CSR activities - particularly with regard to quantum of spending," Institutional Investor Advisory Services has said in a report.

As per the law, in case, companies are unable to shell out the required amount for CSR efforts the same has to be explained.

According to the report, most of the larger companies have committees for oversight of CSR activities and undertake independent audits.

The new Companies Act places greater board level responsibility for CSR activities, including having at least one independent director in the CSR committee.

"It does appear that the frequency of review/monitoring will need to be increased, to ensure adequate tracking of CSR related activities by the board," the report said.

Noting that it is important for companies to formalise and have an effective framework to monitor CSR activities, the report said that shareholders too need to evaluate this spend.

The CSR rule would be applicable to the companies with turnover of Rs 1,000 crore and more, or networth of Rs 500 crore and more, or a net profit of Rs 5 crore and more.

Last week, the Corporate Affairs Ministry had ruled out any change in the proposed minimum quantum of mandatory CSR spending by companies..

Monday, December 9, 2013

To end poverty we also need to ensure equality and sustainability


There's more bang for every development buck when reducing poverty also boosts gender equality, health and the environment

 

 

A girl plays next to a makeshift shelter in New Delhi, IndiaThere seems to be strong political will to do what is needed to end poverty once and for all. But what, concretely, do we need to do? Many things, if we're going to do it right.

It is clearly not only a question of growth, although growth, of course, is essential. Through strong – and targeted – growth, China has been able to bring 600 million people out of poverty. Yet at the same time, economic growth is causing pollution and fuelling climate change, and its benefits are not always shared equally, leaving out women and other vulnerable groups.

Does this complicate matters? Perhaps, but it may actually be easier to try to do it all at once. There is more bang for every development buck when reducing poverty also improves health, environmental sustainability and gender equality. Examples abound.

Cash transfer schemes, for instance, can help poor people to buy food, secure housing or invest in livelihoods – whatever they believe their family most urgently needs. In Brazil, however, Bolsa Familia cash payments have a few strings attached. They require that families have their children vaccinated and enrolled in schools, and the cash is usually given to the woman in the family because they tend to know best how to use money for the benefit of the whole family. In this way, Bolsa Familia has empowered women to improve education and health while reducing the number of poor people.

Poverty reduction can also be green and fair. People often feel they have good reason to cut down rainforests – to provide a living for their families – but when offered an alternative, may be more than willing to protect the land. Costa Rica revolutionised conservation by providing cash payments for environmental services on the premise that those who maintain natural resources should be compensated for doing so. Forests now cover more than 50% of Costa Rica's land, compared with 21% in 1980. Through the UN, several other countries are working to replicate this success.

Agricultural reform can promote growth and equality. By building roads, establishing property rights, giving loans, and providing irrigation and better seeds, some governments – China's, for example – have targeted growth to benefit poor farmers, and in doing so have produced nationwide benefits. It's important to remember that around 70% of farmers in the world are women – often poor women in the countryside who rely on small patches of land. Today, many support programmes are still targeted at men, with women's work counted as domestic chores. The UN has estimated that bringing female farmers' yields to the level of those produced by men could reduce the number of hungry people by 100 million.

Microcredit programmes, properly designed, can have environmental as well as social advantages. Originally created for women and others who were excluded from most sources of loans, microcredit has helped to confirm the potential of women across the world, proving that they can be good entrepreneurs given the chance. In the mountains of Vietnam, a poverty reduction programme found that men were too reckless and ambitious with their investments, and demanded female leadership as a loan condition.

Solar Sister in rural South Africa has generated $46 for every $1 invested in solar power. This is especially important when we consider that 3 billion people still rely on wood or some other biomass for cooking. Aside from being time consuming, such practices can strip local areas of trees – and, most important, using these fuels indoors is bad for health.

We must learn from these examples. Balancing economic growth and equality with environmental sustainability is not only possible – it is essential. No country can reach its full potential without half of its workforce and creative talent. Gender equality in the workforce grows the economy by increasing productivity and creative capacity. By the same token, while we need to understand that developing countries will not sacrifice development for the environment, it is also crucial to remember that development comes to a stop if natural resources are exhausted, water polluted and soil degraded in the process.

No country has yet achieved environmental sustainability, but some countries are making progress. Brazil has reduced poverty and inequality while cutting deforestation by 80%. Ethiopia's growth has mainly benefited the poor, and the country aims to become a middle-income nation without increasing its carbon emissions.

Sustainability and equality are requirements for development. Getting three times the benefit from the same effort makes common sense.

• Erik Solheim is chair of the OECD development assistance committee and former minister of the environment and international development in Norway. The OECD's development co-operation report, Ending Poverty, will be the subject of a live-streamed discussion organised by OECD and Intelligence Squared in London on Thursday at 7pm

Tuesday, December 3, 2013

The rise of sustainability reporting in the corporate world


Dec. 2, 2013 by Sean Kilcarr in Trucks at Work

A  Vide variety of companies are embracing sustainability as an overarching concept in order to be “greener” yet cut costs at the same time.

That’s being backed up by a new finding from the 22 year-old Grant Thornton International Business Report, a global survey of 3,300 businesses in 44 countries conducted quarterly that discerned nearly one-third of them now issue corporate social responsibility (CSR) and sustainability information, either in their financial reports or in separate reports.

http://fleetowner.com/site-files/fleetowner.com/files/uploads/2013/12/Nusbaum.jpg

Ed Nusbaum (seen at left), CEO of Grant Thornton Global, noted that the number of businesses reporting CSR and sustainability is now 31%, up from 25% two years earlier, with such reporting at its highest level in India (69%), Vietnam (64%), the Netherlands (64%) the Philippines (60%) and Mexico (52%). Conversely, Estonia (6%), Poland (12%), New Zealand (16%) Finland (18%) and Australia (19%) are countries with the lowest amounts of businesses reporting.

Still, he thinks more and more companies will choose to report CSR and sustainability issues, and also choose to integrate such information into their financial report.

“Businesses are seeing the value in ‘connecting the dots’ between environmental, social, human resource, governance and financial performance, which will deliver more meaningful information to its stakeholders,” Nusbaum explained.

Overall, Grant Thornton’s poll found 57% of businesses believe CSR and sustainability should be integrated into financial reports, up from 44% two years earlier. Support is strongest in India (89%), the Philippines (86%), Peru (84%) and Brazil (77%). Support proved weakest in Estonia (18%), Sweden (19%), Latvia (26%), Lithuania (37%) and Japan (38%), according to the firm.

http://fleetowner.com/site-files/fleetowner.com/files/uploads/2013/12/wickerUPS.jpg

The survey also found that, within the next five years, an additional 12% of global firms think they will probably report CSR and sustainability, with another 14% thinking it’s “possible” they will do so. The countries with the greatest interest going forward are Mexico (73%), Turkey (71%), Peru (69%), Brazil (66%) and the Philippines (61%), while only a small percentage of businesses in Sweden (2%), Hong Kong (6%), Italy (9%), Norway and Germany (12%) plan to engage in such CSR and sustainability documentation.

Companies that also produce such “sustainability” information on an annual basis are also attempting to gain some competitive leverage through it, too.

Take United Parcel Service for instance: Scott Wicker (above at right), Big Brown’s chief sustainability officer, noted recently that his company views sustainability reporting as a valuable tool for customers, investors and other stakeholders to evaluate the performance and commitment to truly sustainable business practices.

[Wicker also made some interesting comments about how logistics and sustainability can often be two sides of the same coin back when UPS issued its 2011 sustainability report, which you can view below.]

For instance, UPS laid out how its “sustainable” practices helped cut costs during 2012:

·         Using advanced route-planning technology, UPS avoided driving 85 million miles, saving 8.4 million gallons of fuel and 83,000 metric tonnes of CO2 emissions.

·         The expanding deployment of telematics technology eliminated more than 98 million minutes of engine idling time, saving 653,000 gallons of fuel.

·         UPS achieved a net reduction in U.S. domestic energy use at its facilities.

·         UPS earned the highest Carbon Disclosure Project score among all U.S. companies and tied with three others for the top score in the world.

·         In 2011, overall emissions declined 3.5% even though package volume grew by 1.8%.  

Technology plays a big role in UPS’s sustainability initiatives and one good example is the company’s new ORION route optimization software launched this year; an acronym that stands for “On-Road Integrated Optimization and Navigation."

http://fleetowner.com/site-files/fleetowner.com/files/uploads/2013/12/UpsFreight.jpg

UPS expects the rollout of ORION to optimize 10,000 of its delivery routes by the end of the year, reduce miles driven and reinforce UPS's sustainability efforts – reducing fuel consumption by 1.5 million gallons of fuel and cutting CO2 emissions by more than 14,000 metric tonnes. Indeed, Wicker noted that a reduction of just one mile each day per driver over the course of a year saves the company up to $50 million annually.

"The development and deployment of ORION is one of the strongest examples of our commitment to continual investments in operational and customer technologies to deliver significant operational benefits, taking advanced mapping and route optimization to new levels," said Dave Barnes, UPS’s senior vice president and chief information officer. "These benefits range from cost savings to positive environmental impacts and enable our company to raise the bar even higher on efficiency and customer service."

Barnes added that U.S. deployment of ORION to nearly all 55,000 of UPS’s routes is planned to be completed in 2017, with global deployments of the system planned for the future.

I’ll close this post with some interesting comments on sustainability as a guiding principle of business by Ernesto Sirolli, an Italian who got his start doing aid work in Africa in the 1970s; an experience that formed is view of what “sustainable economic development” really means and how entrepreneurs are critical to that vision.

Think about the mention he makes of the panel of experts gathered in 1860 who unanimously believed New York City would cease to exist in 100 years due to its “unsustainable” form of transportation: the horse. Of course, human ingenuity – in the form of the good old internal combustion engine – significantly changed that predicted outcome.

Something to keep in mind as sustainability strategies become ever larger components of the modern business world – especially where trucking is concerned.

 

Sustainability is still more talk than action

Sustainability is still more talk than action

Naren Karunakaran, ET Bureau Nov 11, 2013, 04.00AM IST
Last week was a week of surveys on how companies are taking - or not taking - to sustainability. Three surveys - one Indian and two global - were released.
The message was consistent: companies in general, including from the set of top 200 listed companies in India, are quick and eager to announce policies on corporate responsibility, but are woeful laggards in executing what they profess.
ET compiles the talking points

CSR spend below target

CSR spend below target

 
New Delhi, Nov. 11: Companies prefer to spend on education the most as part of their corporate social responsibility (CSR) but only one in four meet the desired level of investing in social causes, a study has found.
 
The analysis, conducted by professional services firm Deloitte India, suggests that 27 per cent of the 91 top companies studied spent at least 2 per cent of their net profit on CSR-related expenses in 2011-12.
 
Some 37 per cent of the companies spent between 1 and 2 per cent. The remaining 36 per cent spent less than 1 per cent, according to the Annual Status of Higher Education of States and Union Territories in India, 2013, a report brought out by the human resources development ministry and industry body CII.
 
Setting aside a part of their profits for social causes was not mandatory for India Inc., but the recently passed Companies Act, 2013, says business houses have to spend at least 2 per cent of their average net profit on CSR-related support .
 
“The CSR has remained less than 2 per cent for most companies because spending on CSR has been voluntary all along. Companies have been spending on social causes as per their mission and vision of the promoters,” said Rohin Kapoor, senior manager, tax, at Deloitte.
 
The new law, passed in the last session of Parliament, has already got the President’s assent. Now the rules, being drafted by the ministry of corporate affairs, have to be notified.
 
While the study found that companies invest in multiple social service causes, education stood out as the most preferred sector. Some 79 per cent of the companies studied were found to have invested in education, followed by 73 per cent in environment and 69 per cent in health.
 
The report does not give a break-up of sector-wise investment.
 
Kapoor quoted corporate ministry estimates to say that potential investment in CSR was expected to be between Rs 15,000 crore and Rs 18,000 crore annually from next year with the participation of 8,000 to 9,000 eligible companies. A major chunk of this investment is likely to be on education, particularly higher education, he added.
 
Sobha Mishra, education officer at industry chamber Ficci, said CSR-related investment had remained low mainly because growth has been limited to mostly companies in the service sector, which does not depend much on the local population.
 
On the other hand, infrastructure companies, which require large tracts of land, have to depend on local people for day-to-day functioning.
 
“The Tatas, Birlas and other such companies have done a lot on CSR. But the companies which came up in the last two decades, mostly in the service sector, do not depend much on local people,” Mishra explained. “These are export-oriented companies and they do not spend that much on CSR.”
Mishra agreed with Kapoor, the Deloitte manager, on the possibility of education getting the maximum share of CRS funds, saying the sector was at the centre of economic planning.
 
Shalini Singh, who heads the higher education cell at industry body CII, said 60 per cent of Indians were young, but the potential demographic dividends could turn into a disaster if the youths were not educated and trained.
 
“I think the CSR spending on education is certainly going to increase,” she said.

India Inc says collaboration the key to development


ET Bureau Nov 14, 2013, 08.01PM IST

http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/images/pixel.gif
MUMBAI: Corporate India, amidst the current gloom and doom of crippling economic growth, acknowledged that that more collaboration is required amongst the key stakeholders in the country to achieve inclusive and sustainable development going forward.

The Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) publicly launched its India@ 75 programme on Thursday to make India a developed nation in its 75th year of independence. It hopes to achieve this through skill development, urbanization and environmental sustainability, philanthropy and volunteerism.

http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/images/pixel.gif
"We are so weighed down by current issues that we forget about the future. We have to make the future happen," said Rahul Bajaj, chairman of Bajaj Auto. He also added that he was disappointed with the current Congress-led government.

After a honeymoon period with the economy last decade, when India witnessed fast economic growth every year, the country today is facing tough challenges of persistent price rise despite crippling growth.

World Bank has cut India's economic outlook for the year to 4.7% from 6.1% forecast earlier, citing sharp slowdown in manufacturing and business confidence. International Monetary Fund has a more depressed forecast of 3.8%.

While some quarters of corporate India have blamed slow clearances by the government in implementing new projects, there have been concerns about impact of fast urbanization and industrialization on environment and local communities.

"Every major problem that faces society seems to have conflicting constituencies and conflicting objectives,' said S Gopalakrishnan, executive vice chairman at Infosys. "It is necessary to create tools and techniques which will allow us to come to a win-win solution."

India@75 was initially a vision of Professor CK Prahalad, who wrote the book 'Fortune at the bottom of the pyramid.'

Brand social responsibility 2.0

CSR has moved on from tokenism. FMCG companies are increasingly integrating brand and business objectives with social responsibility programmes to make them commercially viable and sustainable

http://bsmedia.business-standard.com/_media/bs/img/article/2013-11/20/full/1384963071-9815.jpg
The country's largest fast moving consumer goods (FMCG) company, Hindustan Unilever (HUL), has just kicked off Project Sunlight, simultaneously with Unilever's other markets, to compile the social missions of its many brands. It is an attempt to invite consumers to get involved in doing small things to help their own families, others and the planet. In India, HUL will highlight brands such as Lifebuoy (cleanliness), Dove (improving women's self esteem) and Knorr (work with farmers).

It is a manifestation of how brands are combining CSR with business objectives.

HUL has been scaling up initiatives for social good across brands. Its recent Domex Toilet Academy, for example, has the objective of building 24,000 toilets by 2015 in areas where there is lack of sanitation. The motivation came from the increasing importance its parent Unilever is giving to the cause of social good as espoused in its "Sustainable Living Plan" flagged off three years ago.

Besides specific sustainability targets, managers at HUL were asked to interpret a social purpose in the local context. The lack of basic sanitation afflicts Indians is well-known in a country which accounts for almost 60 per cent of open defecation in the world.

HUL saw an opportunity to plug its brand Domex, a toilet cleaner competing with Harpic from Reckitt Benckiser. Hemant Bakshi, executive director, home & personal care, HUL, says, "We realise the importance of the need for safe and hygienic sanitation practices. We have an important role to play to help make our communities free of open defecation. As a brand, Domex can make toilets free of disease and safe to use."

Under Lifebuoy, the company has been running a large school contact programme to help sensitise children to the need to wash their hands. Experts say, it is a clever marriage of social and business objectives. By targeting children and instilling in them the need to use a soap to wash hands, HUL is playing a good corporate citizen, even as it creates a ready market in the schools and among the parents of the students.

Tanishq and Havells, through their recent ad campaigns, have been questioning so-called taboos. Tanishq's on-going campaign for its bridal collection, where it portrays remarriage of a woman with a child, has been noted as a break-through by pundits on social media (though, a similar trope had appeared in a Femina ad in 2001).

Havells, the electrical components and appliances brand, touched on issues such as inclusivity (a domestic help being asked to join her employer-family for dinner at the table) and women's rights (a husband's decision to adopt his wife's surname) in its summer campaign this year. Vijay Narayananan, vice-president, marketing, Havells, admits the campaign did stir people enough, making them sit up and take notice of the brand. Launched at a time when the clutter is high on television, Narayanan says the campaign induced recall in a low-involvement category such as fans.

Tata Tea's Jaago Re campaign, meanwhile, has evolved into a viable platform for change. Jaago Re's current edition, coinciding with the relaunch of Tata Tea Gold, dwells on how women should not be ignored by politicians since they constitute 49 per cent of the voter base. Harish Bhat, MD, Tata Global Beverages, says, "At a time when the country is gearing up for elections, it made perfect sense to dwell on this aspect."

As corporate social responsibility (CSR) becomes mandatory for Indian companies, the seriousness with which most are approaching it has increased. Gautam Chemburkar, partner, KPMG, says, "From something that was tracked by a small team, CSR has moved up as a key item on the CEO's list. By making it mandatory for companies to disclose what they've done with the two per cent of profits they now have to set aside for CSR activities, companies will track where the money will go, since it will form part of their distributable profits."

According to industry estimates, the likely obligation arising out of the CSR Bill, which comes into force next fiscal, will be $2 billion (or Rs 12,400 crore). This is if the cumulative profit of India Inc will be $100 billion (or Rs 6.2 lakh crore) by then.

Chemburkar says the Indian corporations can't afford to ignore such an amount. "If earlier companies paid lip-service to CSR, restricting their efforts to communities around their factories, today the scope of their operations has increased," Alpana Parida, president, DY Works, a Mumbai-based brand consultant, says.

Beauty major L'Oreal has just announced its commitment to transform the way it does business by 2020, spanning the entire value chain from manufacturing, marketing to business development. L'Oreal, like Unilever, hopes to touch consumer lives with not only sustainable products, but also initiatives that can help make a difference.

 

Sustaining CSR

This is a great opportunity for corporate India to step into the government’s shoes and effect a social transformation
Gautam Chemburkar

Sustaining CSR

 

Philanthropy, charity and donations have a long tradition in India and continue as an integral part of the local culture across sections of society. Indian industry and business too have been increasingly patronising Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) over the years. Thanks to the new Companies Act 2013, the mandatory spin on CSR is stirring up an interesting debate.

For the first time ever, profit-making Indian companies will have to mandatorily comply on the CSR requirement. This is an interesting development that deserves a closer review, more so to understand and appreciate the distinction between the mandatory and obligatory parts of the CSR requirement. Contrary to general perception, spending on CSR is not mandatory – only the requirement on compliance and reporting is.

A company may trigger the CSR obligation to spend two per cent but may decide not to spend and still be compliant with the regulation. While the trigger does not make it mandatory to spend, it does make it mandatory to comply with section 135 of the Companies Act 2013 that requires appointment of a CSR committee to formulate CSR policy, recommend and monitor spends. The board of directors is mandatorily required to report annually on CSR policy and implementation including digitally through a CSR website. The Ministry of Corporate Affairs seems keen for the company’s CSR policy to be scrutinised by the wider society and reward or punish that company for not spending appropriately.

While Schedule VII of the Companies Act 2013 prescribes specific CSR activities to spend on, a closer scrutiny of the Companies Rules seems to allow the flexibility to spend on other legitimate causes too.

Being voluntary earlier, corporate CSR seems to have been traditionally driven by narrow considerations such as satisfying the vanity of promoter or management group, or help for the community based around the company’s immediate influence. These contributions focused on philanthropy and charitable causes and have typically been of a nominal size.

The new obligation to spend two per cent on CSR now substantially raises the scale of contribution. Corporate India’s increased obligation is speculated to range between Rs.100 – 250 billion and surely changes the dynamic of this subject. Companies will have to start thinking wider and smarter and the emphasis on sustainable CSR ideas consequently is likely to be a lot more pronounced. CSR spends going forward may cover wider societal objectives instead of limiting themselves to smaller community initiatives, and the sustainability factor could influence a healthy alignment between social and commercial business goals. It will surely help companies to identify some pressing and relevant social challenges and develop innovative business solutions to appropriately redress them.


An automotive company’s CSR commitment to donate economy vehicles to replace old taxis from city roads not only addresses serious problems of traffic congestion and carbon emissions, it also helps provide a sustainable livelihood to the taxi drivers. Commercially, it helps the company release working capital by easing out inventory of old vehicles. A food supermarket chain’s willingness to invest its’ CSR obligation on a contract farming platform for marginal farmers could help the cause of the weaker sections of the farming community but importantly secures a steady source of fresh farm produce for the donor company.           

This is a great opportunity for corporate India to step into the government’s shoes and effect a social transformation through the raised bar on corporate governance.


(The author, Gautam Chemburkar is Partner, KPMG)

Do good and tom-tom it

THE HINDU
Photo: B. Jothi Ramalingam

 
89 per cent of Indian businesses believe CSR and sustainability should
be integrated into financial reports.Photo: B. Jothi Ramalingam89 per cent of Indian businesses believes CSR and sustainability should be integrated into financial reports.

A survey by Grant Thornton found that 68 per cent of businesses in India now issues corporate social responsibility (CSR) and sustainability information (up from 32 per cent two years ago), either in the financial report or in separate reports, and that a clear majority believes it should be reported.

The survey was part of the quarterly Grant Thornton International Business Report. “Businesses are also seeing the value in measuring performance in a more holistic manner, considering environmental, social, human resource and governance frameworks, in addition to financial; this will deliver more meaningful information to all stakeholders,” said Mahadevan Narayanamoni, Partner — Advisory Services, Grant Thornton in India.

Globally, the number of businesses reporting CSR and sustainability is highest in India, followed by Vietnam and the Netherlands (64 per cent), the Philippines (60 per cent) and Mexico (52 per cent). In contrast, Estonia (6 per cent), Poland (12 per cent), New Zealand (16 per cent), Finland (18 per cent) and Australia (19 per cent) have lower levels of business reporting. Globally, 31 per cent of businesses is currently reporting CSR and sustainability, up from 25 per cent two years ago.

Overall, 89 per cent of Indian businesses believes CSR and sustainability should be integrated into financial reports — up from 39 per cent two years ago. Support for integration of business information into financial reports is strongest in India, followed by the Philippines (86 per cent), Peru (84 per cent) and Brazil (77 per cent). Support was weakest in Estonia (18 per cent), Sweden (19 per cent), Latvia (26 per cent), Lithuania (37 per cent) and Japan (38 per cent). Globally, 57 per cent of businesses believes CSR and sustainability should be integrated into financial reports — up from 44 per cent two years ago.

An additional 36 per cent of Indian businesses thinks it will probably report CSR and sustainability within the next five years, and another 7 per cent said it was possible. Countries with the greatest interest are Mexico (73 per cent), Turkey (71 per cent), Peru (69 per cent), Brazil (66 per cent), and the Philippines (61 per cent).

Only a small percentage of businesses in Sweden (2 per cent), Hong Kong (6 per cent), Italy (9 per cent), Norway and Germany (12 per cent) plans to report such information. Globally, an additional 12 per cent thinks it will probably report CSR and sustainability, and another 14 per cent said it was possible

The 2013 Companies Act has introduced several provisions that would change the way Indian corporates do business — one such relates to spending on CSR activities. Companies are now required by law to report details of their CSR initiatives in the Directors’ Report and on the company website.

“Corporate India had to wait long for a corporate reporting framework that is current and, with some work, can be considered visionary. Introduction of the ‘comply or explain’ principle in the case of CSR is one such example,” said Vishesh Chandiok, National Managing Partner, Grant Thornton in India.

“CSR reporting, as suggested by the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC), is to structure this report around the company’s business model and the six capitals (financial, manufactured, intellectual, human, social and relationship, and natural) that an organisation uses and affects,” adds Mahadevan.

“The use of the capitals is a means of connecting the financial and CSR performance of the company in an organised way, which may be comparable from company to company and period to period. The benefit of this more integrated reporting is that it better allows the company to describe and measure the values it creates, and hopes to create in the future. It ties together discrete activities and investments with value creation.”

(This article was published on December 1, 2013)
http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/features/taxation-and-accounts/do-good-and-tomtom-it/  

Wednesday, November 27, 2013

Corporates free to choose CSR activities: Sachin Pilot


Press Trust of India

NEW DELHI: Corporate Affairs Minister Sachin Pilot today said the industry would be free to choose CSR programmes and strategies best suited to their company’s philosophy and businesses.

Speaking at the ‘National Summit on CSR’ organised by industry body CII here, Pilot said the government would adopt a “flexible approach” on CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility) which is now part of the new companies law.

“Industry would be free to choose programmes and strategies best aligned to their corporate philosophy and businesses,” he said.

Further he assured the industry that the government would “not apply any rules with retrospective effect”.

According to Pilot if CSR spending reaches the desired objective one would be able to see tangible results.

In monetary terms, it is estimated that the CSR provision would lead to anything from Rs 19,000-25,000 crore annual investment in the country’s social sector.

Talking about CSR, Ministry of Corporate Affairs Additional Secretary M J Joseph said that “when it came to embedding CSR into business strategy, the execution and mainstreaming of strategy was of paramount importance.”

CII National Council on Development Initiatives Chairman Rakesh Bharti Mittal said that government norm mandating three-year track record required for an NGO or foundation to receive funding be relaxed in the event that a foundation belongs to a reputed company.

The new Companies Act makes it mandatory for profit making companies reporting Rs 5 crore or more profits in the last three years to spend at least 2 per cent of their average profits towards CSR activities.

Religious Contributions by Corporates Not CSR Activity: Sachin Pilot


NEW DELHI: According to the new Companies Bill 2012, companies with a net worth of Rs.500 crore or more, a turnover of Rs.1,000 crore or more or a net profit of Rs.5 crore or more in a financial year are mandated to pay 2% of their profit towards CSR.

Corporate Affairs Minister Sachin Pilot on Friday said religions contributions by corporates should not be considered as corporate social responsibility (CSR) activity.

Sachin Pilot“Religious contributions by corporates should not be considered as CSR. For a corporate entity to do religious donations… I don’t think it constitute a part of CSR,” he told reporters on the sidelines of an interactive session with industry honchos organised by the Confederation of Indian Industry.

According to the new Companies Bill 2012, companies with a net worth of Rs.500 crore or more, a turnover of Rs.1,000 crore or more or a net profit of Rs.5 crore or more in a financial year are mandated to pay 2% of their profit towards CSR.

This provision has led to considerable discussion in the corporate sector regarding its pros and cons.

“Certainly, we will make some broad guidelines about what are the things which will be considered as CSR, but it is upto the companies to decide. The boards of the companies have to give approvals to these and it should be put up on the website of the companies for public view,” Pilot said.

While interacting with the industry members earlier, he said out of a total 800,000 companies in the country, around 15,000 companies in India will qualify for CSR activities.

“With CSR being made mandatory, we do not want corporates to spend money on it grudgingly. We want the companies to come forward to contribute in nation-building. It is not about the quantum of money, it is about being part of the social and economic development of the country,” he added.

Pilot said the CSR activities of the companies should be approved by their respective boards. “This will be as open-ended as possible.”

The industry leaders who attended the interactive session were Adi Godrej, chairman, Godrej Group; Kris Gopalakrishnan, executive vice-chairman, Infosys; Kiran Mazumdar Shaw, chairman and managing director, Biocon Limited; Rahul Bajaj of Bajaj Electricals; and Rajive Kaul, chairman, Nicco Corporation, among others.

Regarding the ongoing Tata-Unitech issue, where the Serious Fraud Investigation Office has questioned the purpose of the Rs.1,700 crore deal in 2007 between the Tata Group and Unitech, Pilot said the report will come out in the next few days.

(IANS)

Companies to Have Freedom to Choose CSR Activities, Says Sachin Pilot


NEW DELHI: Corporates would have discretion to decide on what can be considered as CSR activities under the new Companies Act, Union Minister Sachin Pilot said today.

Under the Companies Act, 2013, certain class of entities are required to shell out two per cent of their three-year average annual profit towards corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities.

Sachin PilotDescribing CSR as a new idea being included in the legislation, Pilot said the Ministry is giving only suggestive items regarding such activities.

The Schedule VII of the Companies Act provides a list of activities which may be considered as CSR. The schedule also mentions that “other matters as may be prescribed” could be CSR work.

Referring to this schedule, Pilot said that he was going to replace ‘as may be prescribed’ to “as the company deems fit”.

“I can’t be more liberal than that,” he told a gathering of businessmen here.

Pilot, who was instrumental in pushing the new Companies Act as Corporate Affairs Minister, said that CSR norms would be framed in a transparent manner and kept as “open ended as possible”.

His comments came at an event organised by industry body CII against the backdrop of some corporate leaders raising concerns about the idea of CSR in the new legislation.

Noted industrialist Rahul Bajaj expressed some concerns about certain aspects of the Companies Act including those related to CSR and rotation of auditors.

“To me CSR is the least important…,” Bajaj said. Certain class of profitable companies are required to spend two per cent on CSR activities as per the new legislation. This would be applicable for corporates with turnover of Rs 1,000 crore and more, or net worth of Rs 500 crore and more, or a net profit of Rs 5 crore and more.

Among the activities for CSR under Schedule VII are reducing child mortality and improving maternal health and contribution by companies to the Prime Minister’s National Relief Fund or any other fund set up by the central or state government for socio-economic development.

“The success of this (CSR) would depend on how this is received by the Indian corporates. I am open to all suggestions,” the Minister said.

Pilot also stressed that religious donations does not look like CSR.

Going by estimates, the annual CSR spending by companies is expected to be around Rs 15,000-20,000 crore.

The Ministry is in the process of making rules for implementation of the new Act.
(PTI, 4 Oct 2013)

A CSR more capacious

By Usha Rai

The private sector also needs to adopt a corporate disability policy for inclusion of the differently abled in the workforce.

There are an estimated 3,000 NGOs or civil society organisations working with people with various disabilities in the country. There is, however, no clarity on the number of differently abled — estimates vary from 2.19 per cent of the population (Census 2001) to World Bank and WHO figures of 10 per cent of the population in developing countries. This is a huge human resource whose potential needs to be tapped. With a broad spectrum of disabilities, this is also a sector that needs a lot of monetary and moral support to make them equal partners in development.

However, the new Companies Act seems to have left out disabilities from the mandatory 2 per cent CSR spending of corporation whose net worth is over Rs 500 crore, or those making a profit of over Rs 5 crore a year. It could, however, merely be a listing omission, because marginalised groups have been included.

The National Trust for Disabilities is lobbying for the inclusion of disabilities as a separate category. Though the government has been steadily increasing its budget for disabilities, since it is a state subject, the responsibility of caring for this segment lies with the states. The brunt of caring, nurturing and promoting those with disabilities lies with civil society. Since disability is not a standalone issue but a multi-sectoral, cross-cutting one, hopefully it will be possible to access CSR even before its inclusion as a separate entity.

As Poonam Natrajan, who heads the National Trust, points out, people with disabilities need the same resources as non-disabled people, in terms of schooling, livelihood or residential facilities. They need reasonable accommodation and specific supports. They also need a barrier-free environment. Above all, they need a ramping up of attitudes. People need to include disabled people in all institutions. The accommodations and specific supports may cost a bit, but they are reasonable amounts. So, supporting people with disabilities is more about attitude than money.

One problem is that most NGOs work for specific disabilities. This leads to a kind of a specialisation, perhaps even a ghettoisation. Of late, organisations for disabled persons that work across disabilities have been coming up. However, even here, intellectual and development disabilities, as well as other neurological disabilities and mental illnesses, get left out.

The bigger problem is getting CSR support for the challenged in rural areas, where a sizeable population lives, often cutoff from schooling, health and other facilities available in urban centres. In these areas, they have little to no access to government programmes. Most of the funding comes from foreign donors, unless there is a company adjacent to a rural area. Most work in rural areas focuses on education, water and sanitation. It is important that such programmes be inclusive, responsive and sensitive to the needs of persons with disabilities.

Corporations involved with disabilities per se include ITC, Infosys, Mphasis, Ashok Leyland, Lemon Tree Hotels, Engineers India Limited, ONGC, SAIL, Ascendas and Wipro. CII and FICCI also have included disability in CSR. The Amar Jyoti Charitable Trust in Delhi, which has been running an integrated school for the able and challenged since 1981, gets sporadic support for various events.

Getting jobs for the differently abled has been a major challenge despite the 3 per cent reservation mandated by the 1995 Persons with Disabilities Act in identified government jobs. The reservation is never fulfilled. Recently, the Supreme Court ruled that the 3 per cent reservation has to be earmarked across Group A, B, C and D posts in entities established by or owned and controlled by Central, state governments and local authorities. In three months, vacancies have to be computed and posts for disabled identified.

As far as the private sector is concerned, the act suggested incentives to ensure that persons with disabilities comprised at least 5 per cent of the workforce. Subsequently, the Centre announced an incentive policy, but it is not clear how many corporations took up the government’s offer. However, recently, the minister for social justice and empowerment, Kumari Selja, wrote to the minister of corporate affairs, Sachin Pilot, to ask the private sector to adopt a corporate disability policy for the inclusion of the differently abled in their workforce. It’s heartening to hear of several differently abled people getting jobs due to their excellence and hard work. Employing such people cannot be claimed as CSR. Companies such as Infosys, Mphasis, Vinyas Innovative Technologies Pvt Ltd and IBM are equal opportunity employers and have employed many people with disabilities. The list is growing, but not fast enough.

(The writer, a veteran journalist formerly with ‘The Indian Express’, writes on development issues)
(Article First Published in INDIAN EXPRESS, 15 October 2013)