People with
good hearts often do the most harm. I witnessed this firsthand about 20 years
ago, when – after I’d already been helping to build responsible businesses,
large and small, for some 20 years – I saw the creation of a special business
focus called sustainability. Then came corporate citizenship and other labels.
The
organizations I had worked to develop had never separated out – and, as a
result, fragmented – the work of doing business responsibly. Responsibility was
part of how they did everything, not a sideline. I think separating
responsibility from business operations, while well-intended, ultimately caused
setbacks.
But I
finally see that well intended sidetrack reversing: 2015 is looking bright for
responsible entrepreneurship. Three big shifts in particular that should give
us hope:
1.
Less counting, more caring
Until
recently, most reporting, consulting and corporate programs have used metrics
to leverage responsibility. Managers figure out a way to count everything,
believing a metric is the golden ticket to getting things done. The misguided
notion of “what you measure is what you get” has been the mantra for decades. I
don’t think it’s true. My mantra is: “What you get is what you care about.”
Google,
for instance, is making headway in changing our relationship with food. Instead
of focusing on metrics, it’s finding ways to make people care about the impact
of their food choices on farming, health and climate.
Via global
dialogue and multidisciplinary projects, it aims to create food experiences and
knowledge that brings those impacts to life in a more effective and powerful
way than simply by sharing abstract numbers and statistics.
This
approach has already born fruit: Google has set up its own community-supported
agriculture deals directly with local
farms in Northern
California. If Google and other companies can get more people to care, that
could make it possible to scale for organic farming, resulting in real systemic
change.
2.
Less copying, more innovating
Advertisement
The sustainability movement unwittingly has borrowed many bad ideas from the
traditional business world. Chief among them is the idea of “best practices.”
Copying others’ practices has the tendency to commoditize the same approaches
rather than creating unique ones that are relevant to each situation and
business.
For
example, most companies have separate programs and standards for goals such as
water conservation, fair trade, green building, energy efficiency and more. But
focusing on the individual numbers in each category isn’t enough to make a
business create real change. Being a fair trade brand is a baseline for being a
good business; not a differentiator.
What I
hope to see more of in 2015 is the shifting of entire systems through
innovation. I’m already seeing some signs this trend is growing: take Merida
Meridian, a small US textile design company that has been changing the rug
industry with unique designs and products that exceed sustainability and
fair-trade standards.
The
company creates healthier communities in places – such as Brazilian villages –
where it sources woven, dyed materials. It supports the unique artisan skills
that were being lost to commodity sourcing. And the designs themselves stand
out: Merida Meridian is now considered a “go to” source for top interior
designers around the world.
It would
have missed all that commercial and social success if it had simply pursued the
best practices in its industry.
3.
Fewer substitutions, more game changing
2014 may
have been the year of the social enterprise , but many social enterprises
operate on a small scale. If we want to see true progress, these companies will
need to think bigger.
While most
social ventures offer product substitutes for conscious consumers, they leave
more than 97% of the market to more irresponsible options. Or they focus on
solving a single problem rather than changing the system that produces the
problem. Most, so far, haven’t been disruptive enough to change their whole
industry. But that transformation, I hope, is coming.
Community
Sourced Capital of Seattle, Washington, is changing the financial system that
affects small business investing and local economic vitality in its area. In
particular, it’s taking on the impersonal relationships banks often have with
their communities.
Here’s how
it works: local residents make interest-free loans to local CSC-member
businesses – which are vetted by CSC – to buy equipment and grow. The investors
are investing in the neighborhood, as well as the business. They are deeply
connected to the neighborhood businesses and care if it is succeeds. CSC is
changing both an industry and a social system.
If more
social enterprises find innovative ways to change systems, they could end up
doing far more good.
Carol Sanford is an educator who has worked with
companies such as DuPont, Procter & Gamble, Seventh Generation and Google.
She is also the author of The
Responsible Entrepreneur: Four Game-Changing Archetypes for Founders, Leaders,
and Impact Investors.
No comments:
Post a Comment