CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY MANAGERS GAIN MORE INFLUENCE
Sunday, November 16, 2014 - 11:00am
(3BL Media/Justmeans) – Businesses today face greater economic, social and environmental challenges than ever before. Right from the government, stakeholders and down to the consumers, there is a growing pressure on companies to conduct business in more sustainable ways. To achieve success in this climate, companies are increasingly adopting a more sustainable business approach.
A recent global survey carried out by Verdantix, an independent sustainability research and analysis firm, has revealed that sustainability managers in high-revenue companies around the world are being given more authority and responsibility. The survey tracked 260 sustainability managers from companies with revenues ranging from $250 million to $20 billion.
More than 90 percent of the respondents in the survey reported directly to the company CEO or another member of the executive committee. The number of CEOs who believe that sustainability issues impact their bottom line has grown by one-third to 28 percent. Overall spending on sustainability has also increased across the companies.
The size of their budgets varied significantly, but 65 percent of the respondents said their budgets ranged between $1 million and $2.5 million. Sixty percent of the respondents expected companywide spending on sustainability to increase. This reflects a growing trend whereby the budget of the sustainability team accounts for about 10 percent of companywide sustainability spending.
The topmost priority for most sustainability managers was health and safety, with 92 percent of the respondents citing it as ‘very important’ or ‘important’. Energy and environmental management was nearly an equal priority, with 90 percent considering it as very important or important.
The survey covered sustainability managers from 13 regions, including Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Mexico, the Middle East, Russia, South Africa, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The respondents were chosen from 21 industries ranging from business and financial services to manufacturing and retail.
From Corporate Social Responsibility to Business Model Innovation
Loïc Sadoulet, INSEAD Affiliate Professor of Economics at INSEAD |
Compassion, enlightened self-interest and an innovative approach can make CSR projects a viable part of your business operation.
CSR teams face formidable internal competition when chasing capital expenditure within their organisation, particularly when moving into untested markets.
In the vast majority of listed companies there is an overriding view that private capital should be used to deliver maximum short-term returns to shareholders rather than funding non-core products offering long–term sustainability benefits. So how do you convince the board your project is a legitimate, strategic and viable option for the company?
In many cases this is best achieved by finding a project that has direct links to the firm’s core operations, with a business plan that headquarters can relate to; one that feeds back into the company’s normal growth matrix.
M-Pesa, the world’s first large-scale mobile payment service, is a great example of how good ideas can impact lives and be integrated back into the core business.
M-Pesa (M stands for mobile and Pesa is Swahili for money) is a joint venture between mobile phone giant Vodafone and its Kenyan subsidiary Safaricom. Initially aimed at helping the unbanked population of Kenya receive and repay microfinance loans, the service was quickly adopted as a means to transfer remittances and pay for services. Within three years of its 2007 launch, it had 12.6 million registered users and tens of millions of transactions - equating to 30 billion Kenyan shillings (US$375 million) - every month. Today’s its operations have extended to Afghanistan, South Africa, India and Eastern Europe.
The concept was born in 2004 when a study by Vodafone’s Corporate Responsibility team confirmed what the United Nations had surmised some years earlier; that information and communication technologies were an important lever to improve social and economic conditions in the world’s poorest countries. It was proof, according to team leader Nick Hughes that “there was a lot more we could do” with the first generation network; developments which could turn corporate responsibility into real business opportunities.“There was a lot more we could do”
His initial proposal was turned down by the Vodafone board, which was focused on the imminent launch of 3G. But a couple of senior executives saw the potential and Hughes, refusing to give up, sought financial support from the UK Government’s Challenge Fund set up to assist sustainability innovations. He was awarded £910,000 (US$1.45 million) conditional on Vodafone funding the remaining 50 percent.
When Hughes presented the idea back to Vodafone’s CFO he took a different approach. Rather than introducing the service as a separate CSR initiative he was able to present benefits understood by a traditional telco operator. M-PESA would increase Vodafone’s “stickiness” with its existing client base and boost agent loyalty. In other words he was able to show the proposal made good business sense.
Letting the business evolve
When the pilot programme kicked off in 2005, 500 customers were enrolled (with a free phone) and eight agents trained in buying and selling air time. It soon became evident that the use of M-Pesa was not confined to loan repayments. People were using their M-Pesa float to send money to relatives and pay each other for goods and services. Some used the account to hold money overnight. At the full commercial launch in 2007 the micro-loan payment functionality was removed. Customers were able to deposit or withdraw cash at M-Pesa outlets, transfer money from person to person and send pre-paid airtime. The aptly named communication campaign “Send Money Home” made no reference to either a loans or banking service.
M-Pesa soon became profitable. In addition, and even more importantly, it contributed to a reduction in churn of Safaricom’s customer base. The company has now gone beyond its payments service, forming partnerships to provide a money transfer service between the UK and Kenya; interest-bearing savings accounts; and point-of-sale micro-crop insurance for Kenyan farmers.
Firstly, there was tremendous need for their product. Internal remittances are huge in Kenya, as in many African nations, and the population was looking for a cheaper, safer, more efficient way of moving their money.
Secondly, they had the market. Safaricom already had 80 percent share of the country’s mobile phone market, in other words 80 percent of the population could use their service.
Thirdly they understood the agent economics. Their business plan recognised the need to incentivise agents who had the resources to buy and resell airtime.
Number four, they were flexible. When you bring something new onto the market you have to be able to let it grow in different directions. It doesn’t matter what people use your product for as long as they use it. M-Pesa put the service out on the market and let it evolve.
And finally they took a proactive stance addressing potential risks, working alongside rather than fighting with local regulators.
Finding a versatilebusiness model
Vodafone’s success was the result of a clearly defined objective and a strategy which could adapt. When moving into an unfamiliar marketplace you have to be prepared to adopt innovative business models and different processes.
Working under a CSR platform provides initiatives with a buffer against normal business practices allowing exploration. However once the business is established, real growth will only occur once it is integrated back into the core business.
While many firms engage in CSR for altruistic reasons, the highly competitive business world requires that, when allocating resources to socially responsible initiatives, companies consider their own business needs. Hughes recognised the importance of both. M-Pesa, while providing bottom-line benefits for Vodafone, was also able to use innovative mobile phone technology and business models to tackle development challenges in poorly resourced countries, transforming the lives of millions of people and businesses.
Loïc Sadoulet is Affiliate Professor of Economics at INSEAD.
Burden of sustainability cannot be placed on poor: Sumitra Mahajan
Last Updated: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 - 14:41
New York: Stressing on the need for an equitable development agenda, India has said that the burden of sustainability cannot be placed on the poor and livelihood concerns of the underprivileged not be compromised for lifestyle interests of others.
"We strongly believe that our efforts to mainstream sustainability will remain hollow unless we are able to confront the issues of inequity in consumption of global resources and reducing the unsustainable ecological footprints of the developed countries," Lok Sabha Speaker Sumitra Mahajan said here at a preparatory committee meeting of the Fourth World Conference of Speakers of Parliaments.
Addressing a session on 'Lessons from the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and the future post-2015 development agenda', the Speaker said: "sustainability is a key element in current global discussions, and rightly so. At the same time, the burden of sustainability cannot be placed on the poor."
"Livelihood concerns of the underprivileged cannot be compromised for lifestyle interests of others," she said.
Mahajan noted that the Indian elections held in the summer this year symbolised a great yearning for growth and development by the people of India.
"India is committed to working with the international community to craft an ambitious, comprehensive and equitable development agenda with poverty eradication at its core," she said extending the Indian Parliament's support.
The Indian ideal of frugality and of no wastage need to be embraced in combating climate change and sustainable development, she said adding that countries in Asia, including India, have contributed tremendously in reducing global poverty rates.
She stressed that ending poverty must be the central and overriding objective of the new development agenda for the post-2015 period.
"The new development agenda should be about development, for the promotion of rapid and sustained inclusive growth to make poverty and hunger history," she said.
In the new development agenda, we must also have the political wisdom and courage to look for a transformative shift in solutions. Business as usual will not be sufficient, she added.